The Arab League has terrified us and the panic has affected us!

Written by Nasser Kandil, 

It is clear that the Saudi campaign to characterize Hezbollah of terrorism is neither directed against what is represented by the relationship with Iran, nor with the sectarian identity, the first one is a direct title, Iran is an existing country and it is easy to break up the relationships with it by countries that pretend determination, prestige, power, pride, ability, and challenge, and which review their armies, and make maneuvers  and say that the message has reached to whom it may concern, when they decided to break up their relationships with Iran, they eluded and retreated, Saudi Arabia remains alone accompanied with Bahrain, Riyadh has received mediation projects instead of solidarity’s decisions , while the title of the second one is the addition of the najaf authority to Iran in Iraq, Iraq has a government, so it is better for those who have wanted to classify Hezbollah and the popular crowd because of their sectarian characterization of terrorism to undermine the position of this characterization by braking up the relations with Iraq, but they heard its Minister of Foreign Affairs “ insulting them “ but this has only led to the withdrawal of their Saudi leader from the meeting.

They target Hezbollah as a resistance party, just for that they did not target neither Iran nor Iraq, unless we want to accept the theory that they are cowards, thus targeting Hezbollah as a resistance party means as their way says that they also “drooped” of issuing a decision of classification, they were adequate of a description in the context of the sub-paragraph of the statement that comes behind a paragraph about an Arab country. Traditionally, the composing form which is presented by the concerned country is accepted by others, and who refuses it has be discreet because the description was not stated in the body of the statement, so who was the donor of this paragraph? Who is left? Bahrain talks about attacking it by terrorist actions, it accuses Hezbollah and describes it with terrorism, this turning and deception do not indicate to the strength and the ability of the actors as much as it reveals their weakness, cowardice, and their fear, they are weaker than taking a decision of confrontation.

It is important that they have said that even in deviousness and cheating, so this deviousness and that fraud have formed a way for justification according to the governments which their people will ask about the reason of acceptance or silence, but they have said it against a resistance party while they have not said it before against Israel, since the worst thing they have said about it was the expression of the Israeli enemy, although the issued statements by the Arab League have missed this word for a long time ago, but they ignored its occupation and aggression, on the contrary they have made it their friend, and that’s all.

Neither the entrance of Hanoun has benefitted Islam

Nor the loss of Hanoun has harmed Christianity.

Translated by Lina Shehadeh,